Quick View for Universal Viewer v1.0 beta2

Discuss and announce Total Commander plugins, addons and other useful tools here, both their usage and their development.

Moderators: white, Hacker, petermad, Stefan2

User avatar
Alextp
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 2004-08-16, 22:35 UTC
Location: Russian Federation
Contact:

Post by *Alextp »

Because the purpose in not to make docking, but to make docking in AHK :) In AHK it's better because in this way AHK will be improved (if I understand you right, AHK must be internally improved for this?)

In the second way only my exe will be improved.

Why do you call this "lazy solution"?
User avatar
majkinetor !
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: 2006-01-18, 07:56 UTC
Contact:

Post by *majkinetor ! »

In AHK it's better because in this way AHK will be improved
No, Chris @ AHK didn't want to implement dock command without the proof that it will be useful ?! He asked me to do script prototype. So, even if this script goes well, it will eventually add dock command to the priority list, witch means that it will come after all other things with high priority are implmented. My ETA for this is lets say 1 year.
In the second way only my exe will be improved.
So ? That is the basic point if I recall..
Why do you call this "lazy solution"?
Because it will use timer to periodicly check windows and their placement. So it is lazy and lousy comparing to windows calling me any time windows is moved...
Habemus majkam!
User avatar
Alextp
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 2004-08-16, 22:35 UTC
Location: Russian Federation
Contact:

Post by *Alextp »

Lazy Chris... Ok.. Can it be a dll used by ahk script, not by exe?
User avatar
majkinetor !
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: 2006-01-18, 07:56 UTC
Contact:

Post by *majkinetor ! »

Chris is not lazy, contrary to that. He is the only one programming AHK for now. There are just too many requests and he has to make choices.

Yes, it can be dll used by ahk script. The same dll as above :)
Habemus majkam!
User avatar
Alextp
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 2004-08-16, 22:35 UTC
Location: Russian Federation
Contact:

Post by *Alextp »

OK, so exe can be not touched, All job in ahk?
User avatar
majkinetor !
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: 2006-01-18, 07:56 UTC
Contact:

Post by *majkinetor ! »

ok...
I will deal with it when I find time. I like your app already, and it seems that you improved it a lot. It would be cool to have it around. You can always latter decide to use dll if I create it...
Habemus majkam!
User avatar
Alextp
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 2004-08-16, 22:35 UTC
Location: Russian Federation
Contact:

Post by *Alextp »

BTW: you complained some time ago about image flickering when user goes through collection. This should be fixed now at last with internal Image mode, so if you disable Imagine/SGViewer and use internal viewer, there will be no flicker...
User avatar
majkinetor !
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: 2006-01-18, 07:56 UTC
Contact:

Post by *majkinetor ! »

Good, at least it don't flicker with images anymore, the most common type for viewing.... can you do the same plugins ?

For instance, when seting new file for icon viewer, it will flicker, but if you do some imaging while display is in progres you could prevent that ....
Habemus majkam!
User avatar
Alextp
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 2004-08-16, 22:35 UTC
Location: Russian Federation
Contact:

Post by *Alextp »

Ghisler's idea with displaying a bitmap? I don't like it...
Last edited by Alextp on 2006-10-24, 12:19 UTC, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
majkinetor !
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: 2006-01-18, 07:56 UTC
Contact:

Post by *majkinetor ! »

Why you don't like it ? I mean, we can try and see how it behaves...

Why do you think it is impossible with plugins ? Can't you save the image before calling the plugin, put it on top, call the plugin, remove the old image ?
Habemus majkam!
User avatar
Alextp
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 2004-08-16, 22:35 UTC
Location: Russian Federation
Contact:

Post by *Alextp »

Why you don't like it ?
Because it's hack
I mean, we can try and see how it behaves...
It may behave ok, but it's hack.
User avatar
majkinetor !
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: 2006-01-18, 07:56 UTC
Contact:

Post by *majkinetor ! »

What kind of explanation is that :?:
Its a hack, its a hack....

I don't consider this to be a hack, but even if it is, so what ? It can be optional btw ( [x] remove flicker on reload ).

If you know another method I am willing to listen......
Habemus majkam!
User avatar
Alextp
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 2004-08-16, 22:35 UTC
Location: Russian Federation
Contact:

Post by *Alextp »

I'm not sure this hack will work Ok: even if I display a bitmap, new loaded plugin will draw over it and this gives flicker. If I make bitmap topmost, then it will pop to the top of other topmost windows. It's ugly hack.
User avatar
majkinetor !
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1580
Joined: 2006-01-18, 07:56 UTC
Contact:

Post by *majkinetor ! »

Don't know details... just a theory :)
Maybe it can be done without nasty sideffects... like maybe you can order plugin to write to memory DC instead of visible one, then move the picture after...don't know... but there is possible solutin that works nice.
Habemus majkam!
User avatar
Alextp
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 2321
Joined: 2004-08-16, 22:35 UTC
Location: Russian Federation
Contact:

Post by *Alextp »

It cannot be done without side effects imho, it's bad theory
Post Reply