New FS-Plugin : Versions

djk · Post by *djk » 2003-05-30, 10:40 UTC

Fabio,
I asked you some time ago if it would be possible to ignore html tags inside the place for version number (for the result).
http://www.ghisler.ch/board/viewtopic.php?p=7014#7014.
You haven't answered. Could it be possible?
It often happens that next to the "bold" version number, there is a last modification date, too. But I can't get it cause i get in the result e.g. something like this:
(2.38</b> 12.05.2003) - I don't like the: </b>

BTW: It's a pity, I can't:
- Delete the whole list directly from \\\Versions\
- Delete the search from the list just by pressing DELETE in the searches
- Copy a list just from \\\Versions\ to \\\Versions\ - now I must copy it to any directory, and then copy it back with a new name to \\\Versions\

fabiochelly · Post by *fabiochelly » 2003-05-30, 11:04 UTC

I asked you some time ago if it would be possible to ignore html tags inside the place for version number (for the result).

For the next version

Delete the whole list directly from \\\Versions\

Do you do this very often?

Delete the search from the list just by pressing DELETE in the searches

OK for the next version

Copy a list just from \\\Versions\ to \\\Versions\

I'm not sure it's possible.

djk · Post by *djk » 2003-05-30, 11:34 UTC

fabiochelly wrote:
Delete the whole list directly from \\\Versions\
Do you do this very often?

Now, when I set most of my favourites - I don't need it too much. My configuration seems to be stable.
But when I was trying the plugin - I changed the lists very often, created new lists and... then I had to go TC directory to clean all my spare lists. So I think it can be useful for... new users of your plugin.

I like the answer: "OK for the next version"

fabiochelly · Post by *fabiochelly » 2003-05-30, 12:44 UTC

I like the answer: "OK for the next version"

Why?

djk · Post by *djk » 2003-05-30, 12:54 UTC

fabiochelly wrote:
I like the answer: "OK for the next version"
Why?

That was positive comment - I just like when I ask for something and.. I get an answer ... it will be soon.

djk · Post by *djk » 2003-06-02, 08:40 UTC

Another suggestion:
Now I've got... 14 lists

Some of them are used just for checking new versions of different programs, others are collections of different tools.
I know that it's possible to create mixed list but of course I try to avoid it.
I'd like to be able to easily distinguish the list, I mean it would be good to have different icons for the two types of lists. I realize that there would have to be any additional indicator for them, probably.
What do you think about it?

Post by *Hacker » 2003-06-02, 12:48 UTC

fabiochelly,
Finally have some time to test the plugin - it's cool, thanks.

CADweazle · Post by *CADweazle » 2003-06-02, 13:24 UTC

Lion · Post by *Lion » 2003-06-17, 11:37 UTC

Regarding LAME:

Code: Select all

Recommended LAME|http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?act=ST&f=15&t=478&|recommended LAME|Download LAME|</a>|3.90.3

Regarding plugin:
fabiochelly, is there any way to update progress window with more info in the "To:" label like "bytes transferred", "bytes total" etc. from TIdHTTP or directly from HTTP headers?

fabiochelly · Post by *fabiochelly » 2003-06-17, 17:35 UTC

would it be possible to download the new software directly by F5?

It means that I have to add new parameters: create new search would be more difficult.

fabiochelly · Post by *fabiochelly » 2003-06-17, 17:37 UTC

is there any way to update progress window with more info in the "To:" label like "bytes transferred", "bytes total" etc. from TIdHTTP

When you download webpages (small files mostly), it takes more time to connect to the website than download the page. So the progress won't be very useful because the progress will jump directly from 0 to filesize.

djk · Post by *djk » 2003-06-17, 21:16 UTC

fabiochelly wrote:
would it be possible to download the new software directly by F5?
It means that I have to add new parameters.

It sounds interesting

Lion · Post by *Lion » 2003-06-18, 11:26 UTC

It means that I have to add new parameters

Maybe just fire a custom setup form from the plugin, instead of many "Inputs"?

Post by *Hacker » 2003-06-18, 11:53 UTC

fabiochelly,
It means that I have to add new parameters: create new search would be more difficult.

IMHO it would take just two or three more (optional) strings, similar to the ones already there - search from, search after, search before. Paths not starting with http:// could be retrieved relatively to the webpage address.

Would be great if you could do it.
But it's of course ok if you don't.

TIA
Roman

fabiochelly · Post by *fabiochelly » 2003-06-23, 13:32 UTC

Would be great if you could do it.
But it's of course ok if you don't.

As soon as I have time, I'll add it for next version.