Page 6 of 12

Posted: 2006-01-25, 14:11 UTC
by Sheepdog
MPS wrote:f2 for refreshing would be nice, but i would leave shift+f6 too

how about f12 for refresh then?
F2 does refreshing now (by default).
Refresh is also done by Ctrl+R now.

You seem to have something misunderstood.

sheepdog

Good as-is

Posted: 2006-01-26, 20:39 UTC
by Bloody
Howdy,

I personally find it very good as-is, because Shift-F6 and Shift-F5 are
doing something similar to F6/F5 which i find very logical. I never use
Miocrosoft stuff (Explorer and the like) and personally don't care anyway
about how MS is doing this & that, so i'm just fine with how it is.

Suggestion: keep the keys freely configurable and this thread was just
not necessary.

Greetings,

Oliver 'Bloody' Lange.

Re: Good as-is

Posted: 2006-01-26, 21:23 UTC
by Sheepdog
Bloody wrote:Suggestion: keep the keys freely configurable and this thread was just
not necessary.
Do you know Configuration->Options->Misc: Redefine Hotkeys (keyboard remapping) ?

This poll is about the default behavior of F2.

sheepdog

Re: Good as-is

Posted: 2006-01-26, 21:43 UTC
by Bloody
Sheepdog wrote:Do you know Configuration->Options->Misc: Redefine Hotkeys (keyboard remapping) ?
Whoops, you got me. :)

You're right. However, using Windows without TC would be a horror vision
for me, myself & I. Just glad to have it.

Cheers,

Oliver 'Bloody' Lange.

Posted: 2006-02-10, 02:20 UTC
by MPS
Sheepdog wrote:
MPS wrote:f2 for refreshing would be nice, but i would leave shift+f6 too
how about f12 for refresh then?
F2 does refreshing now (by default).
Refresh is also done by Ctrl+R now.
You seem to have something misunderstood.
sheepdog
right u are, it should be 'f2 for renaming would be nice' :]

Why not implemented yet?

Posted: 2006-03-25, 13:38 UTC
by Rein de Jong
I just passed by. Read this topic and wondered "Why isn't F2 for rename implemented yet"? The poll started in 2003...............

Ctrl-R is what I use from start.

Posted: 2006-03-27, 16:33 UTC
by ghisler(Author)
I'm still worried that I will get a lot of e-mails when i change this. I did already for changing Ctrl+T from Multi-Rename-Tool to creation of a new TAB, and I fear that the F2 change would cause even more problems...

Posted: 2006-03-27, 19:38 UTC
by Rein de Jong
ghisler(Author) wrote: I fear that the F2 change would cause even more problems...
OK. I see the point. Maybe better to close this topic and leave it as is?

Posted: 2006-03-28, 13:05 UTC
by MPS
hmmm... come to think of it... if you want to go windows-like and use F2 for renaming, then it would be a logical step to make F5 a 'refresh' key, which is reserved for copying. and then, F6 )like F5) has always been used for renaming in commanders, so maybe it really should stay as it is now...

Posted: 2006-04-27, 14:00 UTC
by iElectric
What about setup for shortcuts? I want all my programs set at same shortcuts, because it is easier to remember just one button than 4 for each program different

Posted: 2006-04-27, 14:20 UTC
by SanskritFritz
What about setup for shortcuts?
You mean Options / Misc. / Redefine hotkeys (Keyboard remapping) ?

Posted: 2006-04-27, 14:22 UTC
by iElectric
Indeed.

Posted: 2006-04-27, 23:24 UTC
by Sam_Zen
Maybe another perspective would help here. Start with the question :
Should F6 be default only for moving ? Instead of the two functions it has now ?
I suppose this double was a compromise in NC originally, because F2 was mainly used for a 'save' function. With windows this became rather irrelevant, so the button disappeared.
Besides this, there are already various ways within TC to rename file(s). Which one depends on the situation, but I must say that I never use F6 for this action. It's either editing after Shift-F6, or with a second click on the cursor, and sometimes I even use the multi-rename tool for a single file.
I would welcome F2 as a renamer, but then with more power as the one presented with F6 now. Maybe linked to a version of the multi-rename tool with a switch : single/multi or something like that.

A practical aspect : If F2 will be added, the existing TC-buttons must become smaller in width. I don't see any space-problems here, but it brought up the following question : Is the button "Alt+F4 Exit" really necessary ?
To me not, I never use it. I close TC once a day and I get along fine with the 'X' in the upper right corner.
(maybe something for another poll)

Posted: 2006-04-28, 09:57 UTC
by solid
Sam Zen wrote:...but it brought up the following question : Is the button "Alt+F4 Exit" really necessary ?
To me not, I never use it. I close TC once a day and I get along fine with the 'X' in the upper right corner.
(maybe something for another poll)
I defenitely agree with you on this. And also is inconsistent with modifiers and function keys funcionality. But this is defenitely another topic

Posted: 2006-04-28, 10:02 UTC
by Lefteous
Sam Zen wrote:...but it brought up the following question : Is the button "Alt+F4 Exit" really necessary ?
To me not, I never use it. I close TC once a day and I get along fine with the 'X' in the upper right corner.
(maybe something for another poll)

In the unified command system I suggested to show the function keys in the function key bar and the commands which are currently assigned to the these keys.

http://www.ghisler.ch/wiki/index.php/Unified_Command_system