Page 1 of 2

Confirmation after archive testing

Posted: 2013-05-11, 08:20 UTC
by vudu
This is obviosly not so important "feature", but nevertheless I think it can improve user experience.

When you do the compressed archive test (Shift + Alt + F9), it pops up a message box only if the archive is damaged. But, I think it should also inform the user if everything goes well at the end (of course, with MB_ICONINFORMATION icon, not with error/exclamation).

Because sometimes when I'm very tired at work, I can "forget" if I actually have issued a command or not, if there's no explicit feedback from the program :)

Posted: 2013-05-11, 10:52 UTC
by ts4242
Support++

Posted: 2013-05-11, 10:53 UTC
by umbra
I think it's a good idea. For small archives the progress window just blinks and then is gone.

Posted: 2013-05-11, 12:08 UTC
by MVV
I think checksum check window may be adopted for archives testing. It already supports background operation mode and may show statistics for good/bad/unknown archives.

Posted: 2013-05-11, 12:15 UTC
by white
Support++. I have always missed this feedback.

Posted: 2013-05-11, 16:30 UTC
by petermad
Support++

Posted: 2013-05-13, 13:42 UTC
by ghisler(Author)
Hmm, I would find it very annoying if I had to remove a dialog "Everything is OK" after each Alt+Shift+F9...

Posted: 2013-05-17, 13:46 UTC
by MarcinW
I also support this improvement. I often have exactly the same problem as vudu.

Posted: 2013-05-17, 19:37 UTC
by petermad
2ghisler(Author)
I would find it very annoying if I had to remove a dialog "Everything is OK" after each Alt+Shift+F9..

Then make it configurable...

Posted: 2013-05-18, 10:24 UTC
by white
Would it be a good idea to make Test Archive(s) behave the same way as Verify Checksums?

Posted: 2013-05-18, 20:01 UTC
by MVV
white,
Read my post above. :D

Posted: 2013-05-18, 20:34 UTC
by white
MVV wrote:white,
Read my post above. :D
I haven't said anything ;-)

Posted: 2013-05-27, 12:29 UTC
by isidro
I also think that Alt-Shift-F9 should behave the same way as verify checksums. Verify checksum window should keep size and position, it's annoying to move it each time it's used.

It would be nice that Create Checksum would be treated as any other archiver (ZIP, RAR, etc..) so as to create one checksum per directory (feature I really need). MOVE should be disabled.

Posted: 2013-05-27, 12:48 UTC
by ts4242
isidro wrote:It would be nice that Create Checksum would be treated as any other archiver (ZIP, RAR, etc..) so as to create one checksum per directory (feature I really need).
You can select one or more folder and execute cm_CRCcreate, it will create only one md5 file contains checsum of all files in the selected folder(s) and sub-folders.


isidro wrote:MOVE should be disabled.
Move what?

Posted: 2013-05-31, 06:25 UTC
by norfie²
I suggested a confirmation dialog like crc testing feature has it today here (german forum)