Right click directory search??

Sheepdog · Post by *Sheepdog » 2004-06-22, 21:51 UTC

jb wrote:Somewhat contradictory, isn't it?
Please (re-)read my posts above carefully before you reply in a hurry.

I think it isn't the issue of reading in a hurry but of knowledge about the task. Most of the above postings assume from the behavior they observe.

If you want to know the 'one and only' truth you have to wait until @ghisler is giving his coment or to send an email to him - I guess.

I think that the search in TC-context menu is a function of TC because it uses the TC search dialog.

sheepdog

MacQ · Post by *MacQ » 2004-06-23, 05:20 UTC

And I think it's Explorer's, but it's modified to open the TC search dialog instead of Explorer's.

Post by *Hacker » 2004-06-23, 11:29 UTC

It's just a matter of definition. The name "Search..." is the same, the function is different (in TC / Explorer).

Roman

jb · Post by *jb » 2004-06-23, 18:07 UTC

Sheepdog wrote:I think it isn't the issue of reading in a hurry but of knowledge about the task. Most of the above postings assume from the behavior they observe.

If you want to know the 'one and only' truth you have to wait until @ghisler is giving his coment or to send an email to him - I guess.

To Sheepdog:
The issue is surely not the 'one and only' truth, but it is the conversation style. More exactly it's about replying to the point and not just repeating old statements. Among other reasons this has often something to do with reading and replying in hurry. In my previous posts I already explained the apparently conflicting aspects of the current topic and the greater part of my explanation was clearly given as possibility, not as fact. It seems you missed that too.

Furthermore I wonder how you can seriously suggest to bother Mr. Ghisler with an e-mail because of such a unimportant matter, especially since we know that 90% of his work time goes into support and administrative tasks.

Sheepdog · Post by *Sheepdog » 2004-06-23, 19:04 UTC

jb wrote: It seems you missed that too.

sorry you are right. I've missed that you quoted here 2 times MacQ

jb wrote: Furthermore I wonder how you can seriously suggest to bother Mr. Ghisler with an e-mail because of such a unimportant matter, especially since we know that 90% of his work time goes into support and administrative tasks.

Excuse me, but that is not my task. If there is an email-suport I will use it if it's appropriate in my opinion. If it overtax @ghisler it is his business to change things. Maybe he could end the email support or outsource it or anything else....

sheepdog