Another problem: "Move to archive" doesn't seem to work
It's strange I test it under WinXp Sp1 and Win95 - all work fine... From what view mode you move files (standard, Branch or search result)?
I already finished new version, but will not release it, until we solve your problem...
Also, please, describe what happens when you move to archive. And if you can - post a screenshot where I could see files to pack with full path and destination folder. It'll help me to reproduce a situation.
Last edited by SUKER on 2004-11-04, 15:42 UTC, edited 1 time in total.
2SUKER
Ok, now I see where the the problem is. Some of the files have read-only attribute. Unfortunately there was no info that it's not possible to move them so I thought it doesn't do it at all.
Ok, now I see where the the problem is. Some of the files have read-only attribute. Unfortunately there was no info that it's not possible to move them so I thought it doesn't do it at all.
Ok, then i will upload a new version soon. And what would you advice for moving read-only files? Or let it be without any changes?
Thanks for the new version. It seems to work good.
You could hide the horizontal scroll bar if it's not used (now it's disabled).
One more thing - there is also a problem with overwriting if the destination file is read-only. It doesn't overwrite the files and doesn't say anything, so I can suppose it does it and be very suprised when I'll check it.
You could hide the horizontal scroll bar if it's not used (now it's disabled).
It's useful when full path is too long
One more thing - there is also a problem with overwriting if the destination file is read-only. It doesn't overwrite the files and doesn't say anything, so I can suppose it does it and be very suprised when I'll check it.
Ups, my mistake , when I write it, totally forgot about read-only files I fix this as soon as possible...
You could hide the horizontal scroll bar if it's not used (now it's disabled).
It's useful when full path is too long
Yes, I know it can be useful but I meant autohiding it if it's not needed instead of disabling it. I don't know if it's easy to implement or it's standard behaviour.
Yes, I know it can be useful but I meant autohiding it if it's not needed instead of disabling it. I don't know if it's easy to implement or it's standard behaviour.
Hmm... I think this isn't necessary for such small plugin (small amount of text). But if you and others will can convince me...
In any case, first of all someone must translate readme (it more important for understanding what plugin do).
Let's wait, while plugin will appear on totalcmd.net, and what people will say