Multiple expressions in Multi-Rename Tool
Posted: 2020-05-07, 09:00 UTC
Hi dear developers!
I'm not sure if this has even been up before, but anyways, just out of curiosity, would it be possible to make the "Search & Replace" section in our beloved CTRL+M (Multi Rename Tool) to allow more than one expression? Say I want to replace "a" with "b" and "x" with "y", respectively. Right now I use the tool two times in a row, one with each string.
I tried using the first non-accepted-in-filenames-anyways-character that I could think of for a "delimiter", namely the semicolon, so I wrote "a;x" in the Search for field and "b;y" in the Replace field with field, and held my fingers crossed. Nah, it didn't work. In most cases, I guess I could make a pretty complex RegEx line for a one-click chain, but say for simple renaming procedures not even involving regular expressions, wouldn't it be pretty neat if you could chain it kind of the way I suggested?
Assuming it wouldn't somehow "nestle" the renaming process (and therefor not is featured) I'm guessing the implementation would be fairly easy?
Cheers!
I'm not sure if this has even been up before, but anyways, just out of curiosity, would it be possible to make the "Search & Replace" section in our beloved CTRL+M (Multi Rename Tool) to allow more than one expression? Say I want to replace "a" with "b" and "x" with "y", respectively. Right now I use the tool two times in a row, one with each string.
I tried using the first non-accepted-in-filenames-anyways-character that I could think of for a "delimiter", namely the semicolon, so I wrote "a;x" in the Search for field and "b;y" in the Replace field with field, and held my fingers crossed. Nah, it didn't work. In most cases, I guess I could make a pretty complex RegEx line for a one-click chain, but say for simple renaming procedures not even involving regular expressions, wouldn't it be pretty neat if you could chain it kind of the way I suggested?
Assuming it wouldn't somehow "nestle" the renaming process (and therefor not is featured) I'm guessing the implementation would be fairly easy?
Cheers!