Extra lines below Cursor not respected

The behaviour described in the bug report is either by design, or would be far too complex/time-consuming to be changed

Moderators: white, Hacker, petermad, Stefan2

Post Reply
User avatar
funkymonk
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 410
Joined: 2013-12-04, 09:56 UTC

Extra lines below Cursor not respected

Post by *funkymonk »

Hello!

Is it intended or a bug that cm_gotonext and cm_gotoprev do not respect the configured "Extra lines below Cursor"?

BR
funkymonk
User avatar
petermad
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 14739
Joined: 2003-02-05, 20:24 UTC
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Re: Extra lines below Cursor not respected

Post by *petermad »

Confirmed it applies for cm_gotonext and cm_gotoprev assigned to a Keybord shortcut, or used in the Menu, or used in the Command line or in a Button
License #524 (1994)
Danish Total Commander Translator
TC 11.03 32+64bit on Win XP 32bit & Win 7, 8.1 & 10 (22H2) 64bit, 'Everything' 1.5.0.1371a
TC 3.50b4 on Android 6 & 13
Try: TC Extended Menus | TC Languagebar | TC Dark Help | PHSM-Calendar
User avatar
ghisler(Author)
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 48021
Joined: 2003-02-04, 09:46 UTC
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Extra lines below Cursor not respected

Post by *ghisler(Author) »

"Extra lines below Cursor" is only used when you scroll with the keyboard. It's not use for example when you click with the mouse in the "scroll zone". cm_GotoNext/cm_GotoPrev (and cm_GotoNextSelected) do not use it because TC cannot determine how they were invoked.
Author of Total Commander
https://www.ghisler.com
User avatar
funkymonk
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 410
Joined: 2013-12-04, 09:56 UTC

Re: Extra lines below Cursor not respected

Post by *funkymonk »

Ok, I see. Still, for some command sequences it would be nice to have the extra lines respected after the last command. Maybe something like "cm_RespectExtraLines" would be nice to intentionally scroll up/down according to the configured value? Ok, that's certainly not the most important thing...
Post Reply