Multirenaming Tool - [N] - for folders with dot

[monarch-lfv]

Only the drop-down list item for the [±] button is missing.

Confirmed.
But manually written

Code: Select all

[I] ( = [I1] ) and [I0]

- works fine!

[ghisler(Author)]

It's not in +- yet for two reasons:
1. I would like to get some feedback about the implementation first: Maybe I should remove [I1] and [I0] and just use [I]? If it is used twice, it could turn the feature back off, e.g. [I][N][I][E] would do the same as what [I1][N][I0][E] does now?
2. I need some suggestions how to name this feature in the menu so it doesn't get excessively long. Any suggestions?

[Stefan2]

@2

[I]       like [N] but ignore dots in folder names
[I]       folder names, ignoring any dots


?




 

[monarch-lfv]

2ghisler(Author)
1. For me, just [I] is enough.
2. Ignore dots in folder names

[petermad]

It's not in +- yet for two reasons:
1. I would like to get some feedback about the implementation first: Maybe I should remove [I1] and [|0] and just use [I]? If it is used twice, it could turn the feature back off, e.g. [I][N][I][E] would do the same as what [I1][N][I0][E] does now?

I wote for just [I]

2. I need some suggestions how to name this feature in the menu so it doesn't get excessively long. Any suggestions?

[I] Ignore dots in folder names after this position, insert again to cancel

[sa16]

1. For me, just [|] is enough.

I agree.
Without switching after the second [|].

Any suggestions?

2. For folders, template [E] is ignored after this position, [N] uses full name.

[Fla$her]

Maybe I should remove [I1]

It repeats [I], so it's definitely not needed.

2. I need some suggestions how to name this feature in the menu so it doesn't get excessively long. Any suggestions?

I give 3 versions for [I]:
[I] Folders only: move extension to name, [E] is not used
[I] The base folder name includes the extension, [E] is not used
[I] The subsequent folder name includes the extension, making [E] empty

And one for [I0]:
[I0] Disables the action previously specified by [I]

I am against deleting [I0]. Example of a useful move: [I][N]_old\[I0][N]_old

[sa16]

I am against deleting [I0].

Then let be all three [|], [I1] and [I0]. In the menu only [|], the rest in the help.
Moreover, there is already [c1] or [c].

[Fla$her]

Then let be all three [|], [I1] and [I0].

[I1] is a repeat, it doesn't make sense. The curious thing is that [I2], [I3], etc. return path characters from the beginning.

[sa16]

If only 2 template, then [I1] and [I0] (or [a1] and [a0]).

The curious thing is

Yes, [I2-] is identical [2-].

[ghisler(Author)]

[I][N]_old\[I0][N]_old
can be written like this when I remove I0:
[I][N]_old\[I][N]_old

Your suggestions are almost there, we need some more brainstorming. For example:
[I] Folders only: The name [N] includes the extension, [E] is not used

This way both [N] and [E] are present.
Any improvements?

Moderator message from: white » 2023-06-02, 13:43 UTC

Added BBCode to prevent interpretation of [I]

[Fla$her]

[I][N]_old\[I0][N]_old
can be written like this when I remove I0:
[I][N]_old\[I][N]_old

That is, for every odd [I] there will be an enabling and for every even one there will be a disabling?

Any improvements?

If there is a switch, it is better to note this too:
[I] Folders only (on/off): The name [N] includes the extension, [E] is not used
[I] Folders only (switch): The name [N] includes the extension, [E] is not used

[ghisler(Author)]

I like "on/off" more, it makes it more clear that it can also be turned off.

[Fla$her]

Good. Can you answer the question about alternation?

[sa16]

[|] (On/off) Folders only: [N] - name with extension, [E] is not used

See: [A] Name with extension