Copy to Network Storage (NAS) Speed
Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2009-01-07, 12:31 UTC
Copy to Network Storage (NAS) Speed
Hi,
There has been some discussion about the copy speed to network storage and various factors that *might* impact into that. I have found some interesting performance behavior now with TC 8.01 (x64) under Windows 7 (SP1).
In TC options > Copy/Delete > I have set the "Allow use big file copy mode (not using cache)" with the default values
- Source + Target on same disk: 10240 k
- Source + Target on different disks: 64 k
Now, when I start copying a big file (say 6 Gig) from local W7 machine to Buffalo Linkstation NAS, at 1st the copy speed increases and varies between 30000 - 60000 kB/sec, but after say ~30% completion, it drops to 5000-6000 kB / sec and does not increase anymore.
Is that a bug in TC, could something be done with the TC configuration options or something else?
//timo
There has been some discussion about the copy speed to network storage and various factors that *might* impact into that. I have found some interesting performance behavior now with TC 8.01 (x64) under Windows 7 (SP1).
In TC options > Copy/Delete > I have set the "Allow use big file copy mode (not using cache)" with the default values
- Source + Target on same disk: 10240 k
- Source + Target on different disks: 64 k
Now, when I start copying a big file (say 6 Gig) from local W7 machine to Buffalo Linkstation NAS, at 1st the copy speed increases and varies between 30000 - 60000 kB/sec, but after say ~30% completion, it drops to 5000-6000 kB / sec and does not increase anymore.
Is that a bug in TC, could something be done with the TC configuration options or something else?
//timo
Caching effect if you copy from fast medium to slow medium.
Btw. you will get the best speed and compatibility if you check:
[x] use compatibility mode for the following drives
or:
[x] Use standard copy method (recommended)
Regards
Holger
Btw. you will get the best speed and compatibility if you check:
[x] use compatibility mode for the following drives
Code: Select all
/
[x] Use standard copy method (recommended)
Regards
Holger
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2009-01-07, 12:31 UTC
Hi,
//timo
Set compatibility mode for the target (= NAS) drive I guess?Btw. you will get the best speed and compatibility if you check:
[x] use compatibility mode for the following drives
By having this option on, I can not get more than 5000-6000 kB transfer speeds.or: [x] Use standard copy method (recommended)
//timo
Yes.tjsuominen wrote:Set compatibility mode for the target (= NAS) drive I guess?
Either a list of drive letters or / for all network devices (please read the help for further explanations).
I suppose your NAS or network connection (WiFi?) does not allow higher rates.By having this option on, I can not get more than 5000-6000 kB transfer speeds.
Regards
Holger
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2009-01-07, 12:31 UTC
What are you expecting from Wifi?yes, over Wifi
E.g 54Mbits/s (real world 25-30Mbits/s)
divided by 8
=> 6.75MBytes/s (real world 3.15- 3.75MByte/s)
And these are maximum rates which may be much lower if your have multiple networks in your neighborhood, traffic from other clients on your network or a bad connection between clients.
Regards
Holger
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2009-01-07, 12:31 UTC
Thx HolgerK,
Yes I got your points and yes that's perhaps the "WiFi" case. Just to elaborate, my laptop is connected via WLAN to my ZyXel DSL/WLAN modem, which is wired (CAT6) to a Netgear Gigabit Switch to which the NAS is wired (CAT6).
So is this behaviour (= 1st speed is up-to 60000 kB / sec but then say after ~20-30% drops to 5-6000 kB/ sec) due to Windows / my network set-up and has nothing to do with TC?
Just trying to understand
Thx a lot!
//timo
Yes I got your points and yes that's perhaps the "WiFi" case. Just to elaborate, my laptop is connected via WLAN to my ZyXel DSL/WLAN modem, which is wired (CAT6) to a Netgear Gigabit Switch to which the NAS is wired (CAT6).
So is this behaviour (= 1st speed is up-to 60000 kB / sec but then say after ~20-30% drops to 5-6000 kB/ sec) due to Windows / my network set-up and has nothing to do with TC?
Just trying to understand

Thx a lot!
//timo
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2009-01-07, 12:31 UTC
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2009-01-07, 12:31 UTC
- NoSubstitute
- Junior Member
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 2012-02-08, 10:45 UTC
- Location: Malmö, Sweden
This is completely unrelated to TC.
This is completely unrelated to TC.
I just copied some unencrypted files over my network at over 100 MB/s.
That's from my Buffalo Linkstation NAS with Gbit wired network from it to my laptop, with the destination being my superfast 500 GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD.
From my other NAS, an Xtreamer eTrayz, I can't get more than 10 MB/s, despite the fact that it has a GBit nic. There the problem is it runs over Samba/SMB/CIFS which is too heavy for its weak cpu. Over NFS I can get 20 MB/s from it to my Linux server. From my PC-built Linux mediaserver I get between 30-60 MB/s, depending on how fast the harddisk in the system is (they are also all fully encrypted). It too, of course, has a Gbit nic.
Over wifi I have never gotten more than 5 MB/s, no matter how fast Windows says the connection currently is.
I just copied some unencrypted files over my network at over 100 MB/s.
That's from my Buffalo Linkstation NAS with Gbit wired network from it to my laptop, with the destination being my superfast 500 GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD.
From my other NAS, an Xtreamer eTrayz, I can't get more than 10 MB/s, despite the fact that it has a GBit nic. There the problem is it runs over Samba/SMB/CIFS which is too heavy for its weak cpu. Over NFS I can get 20 MB/s from it to my Linux server. From my PC-built Linux mediaserver I get between 30-60 MB/s, depending on how fast the harddisk in the system is (they are also all fully encrypted). It too, of course, has a Gbit nic.
Over wifi I have never gotten more than 5 MB/s, no matter how fast Windows says the connection currently is.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2009-01-07, 12:31 UTC