Why not jump to TC10?

English support forum

Moderators: Hacker, petermad, Stefan2, white

Post Reply
MyTcStory
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 2015-08-22, 15:05 UTC

Why not jump to TC10?

Post by *MyTcStory »

The version of windows desktop operation, microsoft jump it to 10, there's no win9.....Why not jump to tc10. Keep it with microsoft, just looks like very better....
Sob
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 945
Joined: 2005-01-19, 17:33 UTC

Post by *Sob »

Why stop at 10, it's still quite a low number. Look at browsers, they are already over 40. If you want to do something, do it right, jump even farther, be the most advanced program of all. To keep some continuity, take the current version number and just remove the dot. That would make current 8.52 into 852 and next version (most likely) 900. Doesn't that just radiate all the positive energies? Where's the pitiful 10, compared to that? ;)
User avatar
Stefan2
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 4281
Joined: 2007-09-13, 22:20 UTC
Location: Europa

Post by *Stefan2 »

Pfft; 852?



My vote goes for Total Commander 2015








/irony off
User avatar
MVV
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 8711
Joined: 2008-08-03, 12:51 UTC
Location: Russian Federation

Post by *MVV »

Why not 3000 then? Let's create our future today! :)

Happily these funny ideas will be ignored and next TC will be TC 9 regardless of next Windows or Google Chrome versions. :D
User avatar
ZoSTeR
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 1052
Joined: 2004-07-29, 11:00 UTC

Post by *ZoSTeR »

It's got to be OVER 9000!!!
tonifelfe
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 22
Joined: 2007-01-26, 07:57 UTC

Post by *tonifelfe »

Keep "Total Commander", provide updates oftener (beta channel?) and implement a auto-updater (for stable versions, as a option for beta versions too).
krasusczak
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 284
Joined: 2011-09-23, 10:35 UTC

Post by *krasusczak »

9000 only you kidding me?? make it one Billion version
& next release after that will be version no. 10 (because of Redenomination) ^^
seb-
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 276
Joined: 2011-11-15, 06:14 UTC
Location: DE\BN - only part time TC user after switching to Linux ;)

Post by *seb- »

Why not TC∞ ?
krasusczak
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 284
Joined: 2011-09-23, 10:35 UTC

Post by *krasusczak »

hmm because the only continuation after ∞ is the end of the universe...... you really want this? xD
User avatar
MVV
Power Member
Power Member
Posts: 8711
Joined: 2008-08-03, 12:51 UTC
Location: Russian Federation

Post by *MVV »

9000 only you kidding me?? make it one Billion version
Here 9000 is not just a number, you can google phrase "over 9000". :)
hmm because the only continuation after ∞ is the end of the universe...... you really want this? xD
Actually ∞ may be the next after ∞ because it is impossible to say which one is greater. :D
Post Reply