Synchronze dirs with archive in TC11.03 is slower than 10.52

[ter]

Synchronze dirs with ZIP archive (by contents) in TC11.03 is much slower than 10.52.
On the left - unpacked files, on the right - packed archive.

[Stefan2]

That's what you say

Synchronze dirs with ZIP archive (by contents) in TC11.03 is much slower than 10.52.
On the left - unpacked files, on the right - packed archive.

How can we check this out ourselves?
Which storage medium? Which archive (maybe an common download possible)? Archive -Typ? -Size? -Content? -Compression? ....
It's the very same archive as you tested with 10.52? Or do you have both 10.52 and 11.03 in use right now?



Please help us to help you.

 

[ter]

SSD, 1979 files, 368 folders, uncompressed 398 Mb, compressed 169 Mb, Zip compression max, 9

It's my TC copy, so you could try on your own, hah

Yes, it's the same archive

TC10.52 - 47 sec
TC11.03 - 65 sec

[Stefan2]

Thank you for clarifying.





 

[ter]

Sorry, it depends on the antivirus enabled because of many executables. But the question remains.

[ghisler(Author)]

What exactly is slower?
1. The compare step (with compare by content?)
2. The pack step
3. The unpack step

Also what are you packing? Is the archive very big? Are there a lot of small files, or a few very big files?

I ask because TC 11 has a new ZIP packer/unpacker which is usually 2-3 times FASTER than the older packer.

[ghisler(Author)]

Moderator message

Moved to "will not be changed"