Page 1 of 2

cm_CopyNamesToClip & Co flicker/refreshing issues

Posted: 2007-05-19, 12:18 UTC
by roentgen
cm_CopyNamesToClip and all related commands seem to produce very much flickering, especially observed in directories with many files and when any of these commands is triggered with a keyboard shortcut.

Can't this be avoided?

OK with buttons…

Posted: 2007-05-19, 16:29 UTC
by Clo
2roentgen

:) Hello !

• What do you mean exactly with “many files” ?

- I tested here with 39 and 360 selected files from a button (as ususal), I didn't notice any big flickering,
I have only one tiny blinking, but very short, let's say for ~0.1 second …

- I have set a shortcut, and in that case the blinking is a bit longer, 0.2 second about.
- Win XP-Pro SP1 - TC7 RC4x - Free memory amount always > 200 MiB¦512

:mrgreen: KR
Claude
Clo

Posted: 2007-05-19, 17:26 UTC
by roentgen
2Clo
0.2 second about
Well, for me that's about 0.2 seconds too much :wink:, as long as I don't see the reason behind it.
Free memory amount always > 200 MiB¦512
Here, free amount sometimes ~750 M|1.5 G :wink:

Posted: 2007-05-19, 18:06 UTC
by icfu
It looks as if TC would internally SELECT the file for a fraction of a second after the command is issued, as the status bar flickers as well. Perfectly visible when holding down the hotkey and changing the selection colour.

Icfu

Posted: 2007-05-20, 08:52 UTC
by ghisler(Author)
I'm invalidating the file list after a successful copy to clipboard, to signal to the user that something happened! This is intentional.

Posted: 2007-05-20, 10:19 UTC
by Hacker
I also thought it is just a visual cue. :)

Roman

Posted: 2007-05-20, 10:20 UTC
by Hacker
[mod]Moved to the TC7 beta discussion forum.

Hacker (Moderator)[/mod]

Posted: 2007-05-20, 16:31 UTC
by icfu
I'm invalidating the file list after a successful copy to clipboard, to signal to the user that something happened! This is intentional.
Maybe you should use signals that don't look like bugs then, flickering isn't really a good choice.

When using Ctrl+C on a SINGLE file you are using a more intelligent approach too: The file which has the cursor is temporarily marked and the hourglass is shown. When using Ctrl+C on SEVERAL files, only the hourglass is shown.

So, what about inverting the colour of the marked files instead and/or showing an hourglass?

Icfu

Posted: 2007-05-20, 17:10 UTC
by Hacker
Hm, I find it quite OK as it is now.

Roman

Sound ?

Posted: 2007-05-20, 17:12 UTC
by Clo
2icfu

:) Hello Jeff !
So, what about inverting the colour of the marked files instead and/or showing an hourglass?
• I would be happy with a short «ding dong !» sound too to indicate that the operation is successful…
- Better for shortsighted and blind users.
- Although the blink is not too disturbing for me, I agree that it looks like a bug… ;)

:mrgreen: VG
Claude
Clo

Re: Sound ?

Posted: 2007-06-06, 13:23 UTC
by m^2
Clo wrote:2icfu

:) Hello Jeff !
So, what about inverting the colour of the marked files instead and/or showing an hourglass?
• I would be happy with a short «ding dong !» sound too to indicate that the operation is successful…
- Better for shortsighted and blind users.
- Although the blink is not too disturbing for me, I agree that it looks like a bug… ;)

:mrgreen: VG
Claude
Clo
Agree at all.

Posted: 2007-06-06, 14:44 UTC
by roentgen
I don't need and expect any ding-dongs or hourglass effects. Blistering fast and flicker free copying is just fine.

The same I'd expect from the normal Ctrl+C operation but I guess this is more an explorer issue.

Posted: 2007-06-08, 16:20 UTC
by wanderer
icfu wrote:When using Ctrl+C on a SINGLE file you are using a more intelligent approach too: The file which has the cursor is temporarily marked and the hourglass is shown. When using Ctrl+C on SEVERAL files, only the hourglass is shown.
In most programs when something happens you see a change in the mouse cursor so indeed it might be better if TC did just that for 0.2" instead of "flicker".

Posted: 2007-06-08, 17:11 UTC
by Hacker
a change in the mouse cursor so indeed it might be better if TC did just that
Hm, the cursor might be who knows where (other monitor?) and that might not get noticed.

Roman

Posted: 2007-06-08, 17:24 UTC
by wanderer
Hacker wrote:Hm, the cursor might be who knows where (other monitor?) and that might not get noticed.
Well, in that case...
icfu wrote:When using Ctrl+C on a SINGLE file you are using a more intelligent approach too: The file which has the cursor is temporarily marked and the hourglass is shown. When using Ctrl+C on SEVERAL files, only the hourglass is shown.
...this and everything similar should be changed to "flicker" for the shake of uniformity, shouldn't it? :shock: :)

In this case i don't find find flickering that annoying, i just don't understand why the wheel must be reinvented.